mirror of
https://github.com/fluxcd/flux2.git
synced 2026-02-08 00:37:27 +00:00
rfc: Add story 2 and alternatives
Signed-off-by: Paulo Gomes <paulo.gomes@weave.works>
This commit is contained in:
parent
650bea497f
commit
35785b8a6f
1 changed files with 54 additions and 5 deletions
|
|
@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
|
|||
|
||||
**Creation date:** 2022-09-28
|
||||
|
||||
**Last update:** 2022-09-28
|
||||
**Last update:** 2022-10-04
|
||||
|
||||
## Summary
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -62,6 +62,8 @@ The `Gate` API would replace Flagger's current
|
|||
|
||||
### User Stories
|
||||
|
||||
#### Story 1
|
||||
|
||||
> As a member of the SRE team, I want to allow deployments to happen only
|
||||
> in a particular time frame of my own choosing.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -220,13 +222,60 @@ status:
|
|||
|
||||
You could also schedule "No Deploy Fridays" with a CronJob that closes the `maintenance` gate at `0 0 * * FRI`.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Story 2
|
||||
|
||||
> As a member of the SRE team, I want existing deployments to still be
|
||||
> reconciled during a change freeze.
|
||||
|
||||
Gates can be used to block Flux sources from being refreshed, resulting in Flux
|
||||
to continue to reconcile existing approved desired states, whislt new changes
|
||||
are held at a Flux source gate.
|
||||
|
||||
Example:
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
apiVersion: kustomize.toolkit.fluxcd.io/v1beta1
|
||||
kind: GitRepository
|
||||
metadata:
|
||||
name: flux-system
|
||||
namespace: flux-system
|
||||
spec:
|
||||
gates:
|
||||
- name: change-freeze # gate that enforces a change freeze time window
|
||||
status:
|
||||
conditions:
|
||||
- lastTransitionTime: "2022-05-26T01:12:22Z"
|
||||
message: "Reconciliation is blocked as gate 'flux-system/change-freeze' is closed."
|
||||
reason: GateClosed
|
||||
status: "True"
|
||||
type: Blocked
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
This would ensure that Gate changes would not impact the eventual consistency of
|
||||
mid-flight reconciliations that were already deployed in the cluster. Flux would also
|
||||
continue to re-create Flux managed objects that were manually deleted from the cluster.
|
||||
|
||||
### Alternatives
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
List plausible alternatives to the proposal and explain why the proposal is superior.
|
||||
#### Users to implement gating outside of Flux
|
||||
|
||||
This is a good place to incorporate suggestions made during discussion of the RFC.
|
||||
-->
|
||||
##### Before Flux source
|
||||
|
||||
Users could implement their own gating mechanisms as part of their development processes
|
||||
ensuring that their custom rules are applied before the changes reach their Flux sources
|
||||
(i.e. the target Git repository). For example, if deployments are not allowed on Fridays,
|
||||
no PRs would be merged on those days.
|
||||
|
||||
The disadvantage is that some source types may not provide easy ways for users to enforce
|
||||
such rules. When using different source types (e.g. Git, OCI, Helm), multiple implementations
|
||||
may be required.
|
||||
|
||||
##### CronJobs and Flux Suspend
|
||||
|
||||
Users can implement a gating mechanism within Kubernetes by leveraging CronJobs and using
|
||||
the built-in suspend feature in Flux that allows for a Flux object to stop being reconciled
|
||||
until it is resumed. This alternative does not scale well when considering hundreds of Flux
|
||||
objects.
|
||||
|
||||
## Design Details
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue